On Sequencers

Posted by Hans Fugal Wed, 09 Aug 2006 14:11:00 GMT

I get the impression that most users of MIDI sequencers step record. At least, the writers of the sequencers pay little attention to live recording. For evidence, I cite the abundance of tracker sequencers available for Linux, and the three major sequencers for Linux (IMHO) which all fall short in the relatively simple task of accomodating people like me who prefer to record things live: Rosegarden, Muse, and Seq24.

Live recording is not complicated. You need a few basic features, and you need to make them accessible from the keyboard without touching the mouse. Here's an excellent UI model (that makes me drool):

Frontier Design Group's Tranzport

And here's a list of those basic features:

  • FF, REW, Stop, Play, Record
  • Replace and overdub modes.
  • Punch
  • Loop
  • Metronome
  • Lead-in of 2, 1, or 0 measures. My old Roland JW-50 from 1992 did a great job with this. You had the option of no lead-in but you also had the option of key-triggered recording. That is, you press record, and the thing starts recording the moment you start playing. This is extremely useful.
  • Track muting and solo
  • 16 tracks
  • Variable speed (percent of tempo) for slow and fast recording.
  • Undo

That's it. Most sequencers have some or perhaps even most of these features, but leave out essential aspects such as no mousing, replace recording, no lead-in, and not crashing. Rosegarden goes a step further and makes the simple things that you take for granted difficult as well (but it does everything else under the sun and it's hard to justify not using it).

Seq24 is unique in its failure because it is oriented at realtime performance. Note that word, "performance". It could perhaps just as easily be good at realtime recording if it tried, and then in spite of its loop and pattern-based approach it would still be an excellent sequencer for us non-pattern junkies. (Sequence a Bach organ fugue in a tracker, I dare you.)

If I have the honor of speaking to someone who is writing or improving a sequencer, please consider the keyboardists and take my thoughts into consideration. Believe it or not, the lack of these basics will drive a keyboardist crazy just as fast as mousing will drive a CLI junkie crazy. Which is quite ironic as most step-recording Linux sequencer developers are probably CLI junkies.

Comments

  1. zzzirk said about 6 hours later:

    I have had limited success with any of the Linux MIDI sequencers to date and would agree that they all seem to lack many features that seem to me to be of great importance. I've never particularly cared for the idea of step recording in the first place.

(leave url/email »)

   Comment Markup Help Preview comment

Tags

asterisk audio bash bread cs diy fat food health life linux mac music osx review ruby sourdough src typo voip